The.Hottest

Munir Hamad - 1059 pages - Language: English - Publisher: Mercury Learning; (July, 2024).

This book is the most comprehensive book you will find on AutoCAD 2025 – 2D Drafting. Covering all of the 2D concepts, it uses both metric and imperial units to illustrate the myriad drawing and editing tools for this popular application. Use the companion disc to set up drawing exercises and projects and see all of the book’s figures in color. 

AutoCAD 2025 Beginning and Intermediate includes over 100 exercises or “mini-workshops,” that complete small projects from concept through actual plotting. Solving all of the workshops will simulate the creation of three projects (architectural and mechanical) from beginning to end, without overlooking any of the basic commands and functions in AutoCAD 2025.

The major engineering categories of soil are gravel, sand, silt, and clay. There is not unanimous agreement on the exact division between each of these major soil types, but gravel and sand are universally considered coarse-grained soil, for the individual particles are large enough to be distinguished without magnification. Silts and clays are considered fine-grained soil because of their small particles—too small, for the most part, to be seen unaided.

The most commonly used divisions for classifying soils for engineering and construction purposes are shown in the table. On a comparative basis, the division sizes between gravel and sand (4.76 mm or 2.00 mm) and between sand and silt–clay (0.074 mm or 0.05 mm) are actually quite close. As a result, lack of agreement on these division sizes normally does not cause serious problems.

Particle Size Classification
Particles larger than gravel are commonly referred to as cobbles or boulders. Again, no unanimous agreement exists on the range of sizes. When gravel extends up to the 200 mm (8 in.) size, anything larger would be termed a boulder. Where the 80 mm (3 in.) size, or thereabouts, is taken as the upper size for gravel, the sizes between 80 mm and 200 mm may be designated as cobbles, and anything larger than 200 mm (8 in.) as boulders. However, 150 mm or 300 mm (6 in. or 12 in.) may also be taken as the division between cobbles and boulders. As for sands and gravels, these discrepancies usually do not cause serious problems. Conventionally, when a construction project requires a particular material, it has become standard practice to indicate the soil or aggregate requirements on the basis of size instead of, or in addition to, classification.

In conclusion, particle size serves as the basis for classification of sands, gravels, cobbles, and boulders.

The classification of a fine-grained soil as either a silt or a clay is not done on the basis of particle size but, rather, is based on the plasticity or nonplasticity of the material. Clay soil is plastic over a range of water content; that is, the soil can be remolded or deformed without causing cracking, breaking, or change in volume, and will retain the remolded shape. The clays are frequently “sticky.” When dried, a clay soil possesses very high strength (resistance to crushing). A silt soil possesses little or no plasticity and, when dried, has little strength. If a small sample of moist silt is shaken easily but rapidly in the palm of the hand, water will appear on the surface of the sample but disappear when the shaking stops. This is referred to as dilatancy. When a sample of moist clay is similarly shaken, the surface will not become wetted.

The reason for the difference in behavior between clay and silt relates to the difference in mineralogical composition of the soil types and particle shape. Silt soils are very small particles of disintegrated rock, as are sands and gravels, and possess the same general shape and mineralogical composition as sands and gravels (which are nonplastic). The clay minerals, however, represent chemical changes that have resulted from decomposition and alteration of the original rock minerals. The effect is that their size and shape are significantly different from those of other types of soil particles. This is discussed further in a following section.

Naturally occurring soil deposits most generally include more than one soil type. When they are classified, all the soil types actually present should be indicated, but the major constituent soil type should dominate the description, while the soils of lesser percentage are used as modifying terms; for example, a material that is mostly sand but includes silt would be classified as a silty sand, whereas a silt–clay mixture with mostly clay would be termed a silty clay.

Although a soil may be predominantly coarse-grained, the presence of silt or clay can have a significant effect on the properties of the mixture. Where the amount of finegrained material exceeds about one-third of the total soil, the mixture behaves more like a fine-grained soil than a coarse-grained soil.

The condition also exists where small fragments of decomposed vegetation are mixed with the soil, particularly fine-grained soils. Organic material mixed with the nonorganic soil can have striking detrimental effects on the strength and compressibility properties of the material. The presence of organic material should be carefully considered. A foul odor is characteristically though not always associated with such soils, as is a blackish or dark gray color. Soils in this category are designated as organic (e.g., organic silt or organic clay) in comparison to a nonorganic designation for soil free of decomposed vegetation.

It is practically impossible and economically infeasible to completely explore the whole project site. You have to make judgments on the number, location, and depths of borings to provide sufficient information for design and construction. The number and depths of borings should cover the zone of soil that would be affected by the structural loads. There is no fixed rule to follow. In most cases, the number and depths of borings are governed by experience based on the geological character of the ground, the importance of the structure, the structural loads, and the availability of equipment.

Building codes and regulatory bodies provide guidelines on the minimum number and depths of borings. The number of boreholes should be adequate to detect variations of the soils at the site. If the locations of the loads on the footprint of the structure are known (this is often not the case), you should consider drilling at least one borehole at the location of the heaviest load. As a guide, a minimum of three boreholes should be drilled for a building area of about 250 m² (2500 ft²) and about five for a building area of about 1000 m² (10,000 ft²).

Some guidelines on the minimum number of boreholes for buildings and for due diligence in subdivisions are given in the Table 1

Guidelines for the Minimum Number of Boreholes for Buildings and Subdivisions Based on Area
Some general guidance on the depth of boreholes is provided in the following:

• In compressible soils such as clays, the borings should penetrate to at least between 1 and 3 times the width of the proposed foundation below the depth of embedment or until the stress increment due to the heaviest foundation load is less than 10%, whichever is greater.

• In very stiff clays and dense, coarse-grained soils, borings should penetrate 5 m to 6 m to prove that the thickness of the stratum is adequate.

Borings should penetrate at least 3 m into rock.

• Borings must penetrate below any fills or very soft deposits below the proposed structure.

• The minimum depth of boreholes should be 6 m unless bedrock or very dense material is encountered. General guidelines for the minimum number or frequency of boreholes and their minimum depths for common geotechnical structures are shown in the Table 2.

Guidelines for the Minimum Number or Frequency and Depths of Boreholes for Common Geostructures

Buddhima Indraratna, Ana Heitor, Jayan Vinod - 254 pages - Language: English - Publisher: CRC Press; (December, 2020).

This book covers problems and their solution of a wide range of geotechnical topics. Every chapter starts with a summary of key concepts and theory, followed by worked-out examples, and ends with a short list of key references. It presents a unique collection of step by step solutions from basic to more complex problems in various topics of geotechnical engineering, including fundamental topics such as effective stress, permeability, elastic deformation, shear strength and critical state together with more applied topics such retaining structures and dams, excavation and tunnels, pavement infrastructure, unsaturated soil mechanics, marine works, ground monitoring.

This book aims to provide students (undergraduates and postgraduates) and practitioners alike a reference guide on how to solve typical geotechnical problems.

Features: Guide for solving typical geotechnical problems complementing geotechnical textbooks. + Reference guide for practitioners to assist in determining solutions to complex geotechnical problems via simple methods.

Alan J. Lutenegger - 654 pages - Language: English - Publisher: CRC Press; (May, 2021).


In Situ Testing Methods in Geotechnical Engineering covers the field of applied geotechnical engineering related to the use of in situ testing of soils to determine soil properties and parameters for geotechnical design. It provides an overview of the practical aspects of the most routine and common test methods, as well as test methods that engineers may wish to include on specific projects. It is suited for a graduate-level course on field testing of soils and will also aid practicing engineers.

Test procedures for determining in situ lateral stress, strength, and stiffness properties of soils are examined, as is the determination of stress history and rate of consolidation. Readers will be introduced to various approaches to geotechnical design of shallow and deep foundations using in situ tests. Importantly, the text discusses the potential advantages and disadvantages of using in situ tests.

Donald P. Coduto, William A. Kitch, Man-chu Ronald Yeung - 984 pages - Language: English - Publisher: Pearson; 3rd edition (January, 2015).


Foundation Design: Principles and Practices includes the most noteworthy research and advancements in Foundation Engineering. Following a systematic approach of identifying major concepts followed by strategic analysis and design, the Third Edition teaches students not only how to understand foundation engineering, but to apply it to real problems. 

The highly up-to-date material places great emphasis on limit state design and includes a new focus on load and resistance factor design in both the structural and geotechnical aspects of the process.

Robert W. Day - 1101 pages - Language: ‎English - Publisher: McGraw Hill; 2nd Edition (August, 2012).

Fully updated for the 2012 International Building Code, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Handbook, Second Edition discusses basic earthquake principles, common earthquake effects, and typical structural damage caused by seismic shaking. Earthquake computations for conditions commonly encountered by design engineers, such as liquefaction, settlement, bearing capacity, and slope stability, are included. Site improvement methods that can be used to mitigate the effects of earthquakes on structures are also described in this practical, comprehensive guide.

Coverage includes: Basic earthquake principles + Common earthquake effects + Earthquake structural damage + Site investigation for geotechnical earthquake engineering + Liquefaction + Earthquake-induced settlement + Bearing capacity analyses for earthquakes + Slope stability analyses for earthquakes + Retaining wall analyses for earthquakes + Other geotechnical earthquake engineering analyses + Grading and other soil improvement methods + Foundation alternatives to mitigate earthquake effects + Earthquake provisions in building codes

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.